When it comes to protecting your creative work or brand, understanding the differences between copyright and trademark is key ...

Lamar Jackson and Dale Earnhardt may have butted heads over the number 8, but in some types of logos, it turns out the ...

The IP High Court has dismissed an application – filed by a group of Japanese legal experts – for a declaration of invalidity ...

Lamar Jackson’s drive to win the battle of the famous No. 8s is racing on. Last year, Jackson challenged a trademark claim from Pro Football Hall of Fame quarterback Troy Aikman to put “EIGHT ...

TASS/. American rock band Linkin Park submitted an application with Russia’s Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) to register a trademark with the band's updated logo ...

Kazia Therapeutics (KZIA) announced the sale of all intellectual property and trademarks rights to Cantrixil for $1M. In March 2021, Vivesto licensed the exclusive global development and ...

In a surprising legal development, pop superstar Lady Gaga is being sued by California surf brand Lost International for trademark infringement regarding her new Mayhem merchandise. This lawsuit ...

Lady Gaga was hit with a $100 million lawsuit by a California surf company over claims the pop star stole their logo for her new ... the ‘Mayhem’ name, trademark, and stylized mark by ...

The California-based surf brand Lost International claim that the singer is ripping off a trademark they've had since 2015 Kevin Mazur/Getty Lost International is suing Lady Gaga for using a logo ...

A surfboard company is suing Lady Gaga, claiming that the singer stole their logo for her new album cover. Court documents obtained by TMZ, state that Lost International filed the suit against the ...

According to the lawsuit, Lost International has owned the "Mayhem" trademark since 2015 and asserts that Gaga is improperly using their logo without permission. They expressed that she did not cease ...

The suit contends Lady Gaga’s use of the logo is causing confusion with the ... “Mayhem,” and its associated products violate the trademark it has used since the 1980s.