President Trump wants an alternative to the World Health Organization: how should we respond?
Much attention has rightly been placed on how to fill the World Health Organization’s funding gap if and when the US withdraws. Kent Buse and colleagues argue that President Trump’s idea to establish a parallel structure is equally insidious as withdrawing from WHO Some things are much better done together,
More than half of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from its membership in the WHO. As of April 2024, 25% of U.S. adults say the country benefits a great deal from its membership, while about one ...
Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been told to halt all communication with the World Health ...
The World Health Organization is shaped by its members: 194 countries that set health priorities and make agreements about ...
allAfrica.com on MSN2h
Kenya Reaffirms Commitment to HIV Treatment Amid Global Funding CutsThe Ministry of Health has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention programs in light of the U.S. withdrawal.President Donald Trump announced pulling the US from the ...
World Health Organization officials declared the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak -- later to be dubbed COVID-19 -- a public ...
A yearlong outbreak of tuberculosis in the Kansas City, Kansas area has taken local experts aback, even if it does not appear ...
The endTB trial is one of four recent randomized controlled trials testing new, shorter, and less toxic treatment regimens ...
If the U.S. withdraws funding and support from WHO, critical programs that support the survival of women and children will be at risk.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback