The plan passed by the GOP-led U.S. House ignores a precedent that only states can decide who gets to vote, law professor John Martin writes.

New Delhi | States cannot refuse to implement the Waqf Amendment Act, the BJP asserted on Monday citing constitutional ...

After immigration sweeps in Kern County and a CalMatters investigation, the federal government will train California agents ...

Act, 2025, which came into force, has sparked controversy with over 10 petitions filed in the Supreme Court challenging its ...

The suit would essentially force taxpayers to pay for an effort to dismantle the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, which was ...

President Trump has to give up his office after his second term. But his refusal to accept that underscores how far he is ...

The Waqf Bill has been tabled in the Rajya Sabha amid INDIA bloc's protest against the bill. The Bill was passed in the Lok ...

Wisconsin’s photo ID requirement for voting will be elevated from state law to constitutional amendment under a proposal ...

House Speaker Mike Johnson gave a quick reality check to President Trump’s musings about pursuing a third term in the White ...

Though the 22nd Amendment prohibits Trump from being elected president again, it does not prohibit him from serving as ...

Landry and his allies had crisscrossed the state in support of an amendment that would have made sweeping changes to the revenue and finance section of the state’s constitution. The amendment received ...

Smith, pointing to that interview, said Bannon was “talking about violating the Constitution of the United States, the 22nd Amendment,” and added, “Everybody just glosses over it.” ...